Goebbels would be proud of the propaganda the anti-gunners are creating:
“NRA Member Finds Most Gun Dealers Favor Background Checks
Here’s something the National Rifle Association would rather you didn’t know: A new survey out this week finds a majority of gun dealers support both comprehensive background checks on gun buyers, and banning people with serious criminal records, mental illnesses, or a history of alcohol abuse from buying firearms.
The NRA was apparently so worked up about this survey, launched in 2011 by Garen Wintemute, a University of California-Davis professor of emergency medicine, that the group sent a letter to its members asking them not to participate. But as Al Jazeera reports, it turns out Wintemute (whose research on the impacts of gun control measures we discussed in our May issue) is himself an NRA member. “I’ve been a member for many years, partly because I’ve enjoyed shooting in the past and partly in connection with my research,” Wintemute told me. He chose to disregard the group’s suggestion that he not cooperate with himself. Instead, he went on to gather information from 1,601 gun dealers, pawnshops, and gunsmiths in 43 states.
Guess those dealers didn’t get the memo—or could it be that the NRA’s clout among its members isn’t as strong as Congress seems to think?”
Source: http://www.psmag.com/politics/nra-member-finds-gun-dealers-favor-background-checks-66986/
Of course the NRA didn’t want gun dealers to participate, would a black business owner want to answer questions from the Ku Klux Klan? Do Jews do business with Nazis? Wintemute is a false NRA member, he’s a spy.
Look at his professional profile page:
Garen J. Wintemute, M.D., M.P.H.
Professor of Emergency Medicine
Director of the UC Davis Violence Prevention Research Program
Garen Wintemute is a pioneer in the field of injury epidemiology and the prevention of firearm violence, which results in approximately 30,000 deaths a year and approximately 75,000 nonfatal injuries seen in hospital emergency departments. In the 1980s, he was among the first to look at the problem of guns and violence as a public-health issue and emphasize the importance of prevention, even for clinicians. At that time, guns and the violence associated with them were considered as a mental-health or crime problem.
His longstanding commitment to understand the nature of firearm violence and its underlying causes has produced a uniquely rich and informative body of research on firearm violence that directly improves the health and safety of Americans and that has positioned California — and UC Davis — as national leaders in efforts to break the cycle of gun violence. He has testified before Congress, the California Legislature and various local governments and has served as a consultant for the National Institute of Justice; the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms; and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
- In a series of large-scales studies, he demonstrated that denying firearm purchases by high-risk individuals significantly reduces their risk of committing violent crimes. This work also identified important risk factors for violent crime among those who purchase firearms legally.
- His research has demonstrated the importance of unregulated private-party gun sales, at gun shows and elsewhere, as a source of guns used in crime. The findings point to specific policy-based solutions.
- After the schoolyard deaths of four children in Stockton by a man using an assault weapon, he assembled data on assault weapons and served as a technical advisor to the state Legislature as it worked to ban assault weapons in California.
- In “Ring of Fire,” a landmark report on the gun industry published in 1994, he identified a small family of manufacturers in the Los Angeles area that produced cheap guns used in thousands of firearm crimes each year. The report led to local and statewide bans on the manufacture of “Saturday-night specials” and related guns. Today, all of the original manufacturers, except one, are out of business.
- He has just completed the first-ever survey research on licensed firearm retailers and the evaluation of a new effort in California to prevent the use of guns in domestic violence.
Source: http://www.ucdmc.ucdavis.edu/vprp/aboutus/wintemute.html
I don’t give a crap if he enjoys recreational shooting. You either support the 2nd Amendment, or you don’t. Wintermute has made a career out of bashing the 2nd Amendment. He’s not even fair and balanced, why doesn’t he research how gun owners prevent violence against themselves and others more than a million times a year? Why doesn’t he do the same research John Lot did? Obviously, the University of California isn’t interested in pro-gun research, and neither is Witnermute.