Airsoft Control: Liberals turn on popular toys.

You’ve heard about the 13-year-old with a BB gun that got shot by a cop. After the people got tired of blaming the cop, they turn on the tool:

“…has reignited a national debate on the wisdom of manufacturing BB, pellet and airsoft guns to look like firearms, and whether new laws or bans are needed to prevent future tragedy.”

Source: http://www.pressdemocrat.com/article/20131110/articles/131119980#page=0

But of course, let’s ruin life for everyone because of one single tragedy. Just because Andy Lopez didn’t put his BB-gun down when the cop told him to, doesn’t mean Airsoft is the problem.

“What purpose do these imitation firearms serve?” said Assemblywoman Mariko Yamada, D-Davis, whose district includes part of Sonoma Valley and the city of Rohnert Park. “Do we need to manufacture them?”

 

Look at how they talk, this woman has never built anything in her life, much less change a flat tire, yet she said “do we need to manufacture them” as if it was her company, her business, her decision.

As for what purpose they serve, tell me, Mariko, what purpose does PBS serve? What purpose do city and state-funded museums and opera houses serve?  These cultural collectivists just can’t accept that all have different ways of entertaining ourselves. Now I’m not into Airsoft, to me that’s like having sex with a blowup doll when you could be screwing the real thing, but I respect those that do, and so should Mariko.

Ryan Podesta, who owns Thirty First Outfitters and Playland in Cotati, said kids want BB guns that look like the real thing, and that they’ll simply modify the weapons if the law changes.

“John Wayne didn’t have a pink rifle. Arnold Schwarzenegger doesn’t carry an orange machine gun,” Podesta said. “Our military and heroes and our troops that we’re supporting and who kids look up to … they’re not carrying around Day-Glo weapons.”

He called the response to Lopez’s death a “knee-jerk reaction” to a “terrible incident.”

Exactly! Maybe Mariko needs to focus on her job and leave the toys to the toymakers and sellers. Jesus F. Christ, these Californians would regulate how many times we go to the bathroom if they could.

Toy Gun Control Discussed.

I’m not an anti-cop kind of guy, but why is it that whenever they make a mistake, we must pay the price?

SAN FRANCISCO — Andy Lopez was walking to a friend’s home on the outskirts of Santa Rosa when a sheriff’s deputy shot and killed him, mistaking the eighth-grader’s plastic BB gun for an assault weapon.

….

“There are so many kids running around with these things that it is almost inevitable there will be additional shootings in the future,” said Dan Reeves, chief of staff to state Sen. Kevin de León (D-Los Angeles).

De León carried a bill in 2011 at the behest of Los Angeles Police Chief Charlie Beck to require BB guns be painted bright colors. It followed an LAPD officer’s shooting of a teenager who had an airsoft pistol, a replica of a Beretta handgun.

Source: http://www.latimes.com/local/la-me-replica-guns-20131105,0,6522365.story#axzz2jnpBtEo5

 

Really? There are real guns painted in bright colors. Here’s an idea, don’t pass collective laws over individual acts.

Gov. Jerry Brown, a gun owner, tends to be skeptical of gun regulations.

How much medical marijuana are they smoking at the LA Times. Isn’t that the same Jerry Brown who signed a bunch of new gun control laws? Why yes he did:

Assembly Bill 809  will require the registration of any newly purchased long guns.

Senate Bill 819 allows the Department of Justice to use the Dealer Record of Sales (DROS) funds to help pay for enforcement of California firearm possession laws in the Armed & Prohibited Persons Systems program. The DROS fund monies were originally collected from every firearm purchaser to pay for the administrative process for background checks.  This new law will divert hundreds of thousands of dollars of DROS fee monies that YOU have paid for background checks.  As a result, the DROS fund will run out of money and when it does, they will want another increase in the fees YOU PAY for FIREARM background checks in California.

Assembly Bill 144 bans the open carrying of an unloaded handgun.  In reality, the open carrying of firearms by law-abiding citizens is caused by California’s unfair concealed carry laws, which allow citizens from one county to apply for and receive a permit while neighbors in the next county are denied that basic right in an arbitrary manner.

Senate Bill 427 was vetoed by the Governor. Unfortunately, the only reason he vetoed this bill was because of the pending lawsuit against its predecessor, AB 962.  Not once did the Governor mention how this bill will negatively affect California gun owners, sportsmen or retailers.
Source: http://www.nraila.org/hunting/issues-and-alerts/2011/10/california-governor-jerry-brown-signs.aspx

But let’s give credit where credit is due:

Governor Brown did sign one pro-gun bill (SB 610) into law.

Senate Bill 610 standardizes the application process for a permit to carry a concealed handgun and removes the requirement that a CCW applicant obtain liability insurance as a condition of obtaining a CCW permit.

Source: Idem

Why did he do that? I don’t know. Maybe he figured out that obtaining liability insurance would keep a lot of gun owners from getting a CCW, and if they don’t get a CCW, California can’t get much needed funds. Or, perhaps he himself has a CCW and didn’t want to pay for liability insurance. Or maybe he did it so he can send gun owners letters telling us what a pro-gun patriot he is. Either way, doing the right thing once doesn’t make him “skeptical of gun regulations.”