The British are crazy.
“Jenkins was on patrol in an armed response vehicle when he told his colleague, also in the car, he needed to visit a house that he owned, and which he had rented out to the woman and her husband.
It was there the woman…and PC Jenkins had consensual sex, with his gun attached to his trousers, which were down around his ankles.
After the woman’s husband found out and complained to police, the Gwent force sent a report to the IPCC that redacted key details, such as the fact PC Jenkins had his weapon on him.
….
“Any officer having sex on duty is unacceptable behaviour that falls well below what is expected of all police officers. Those who carry firearms are rightly subject to the highest standards of training, procedures and discipline.”
Source: http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/aug/12/police-man-sex-gun-ankles-gwent
#1. The gun was on his ankle hoslter, he never took it out. So how exactly did he endangered anyone?
#2. I agree that having sex on duty is unacceptable, and adultery is beyond the pale.
But if you’re going to get upset, it should be over this: “On arrival at the address he describes that himself and (redacted) engaged in sexual activity. He states that he took off his body armour, leaving his T-shirt, and then took down his trousers to his ankles in order to engage in sexual activity.
Not this: “He confirmed that his sidearm was still attached to his trousers at the time, in its holster, and that it was loaded.”
Google+
Gregory Smith