Only in Texas: Armed Man in Banana Suit

I’m filling this under gun-banners because of how everyone was treated.

BEAUMONT, Texas, Feb. 11 (UPI) – Police in Texas said they responded to a report of a man in a banana costume with an AK-47 at the side of a road and found a man promoting a nearby gun store.

Beaumont police said they responded to a street corner in the city on a report of a man in a banana costume holding an AK-47 and they arrived to find an 18-year-old wearing the costume and directing people to nearby store Golden Triangle Tactical with the assault rifle hanging across his back, KBMT-TV, Beaumont, reported Tuesday.

Armed and delicious. Texas cops issued a citation to a man who toted an AK-47 as part of an ill-conceived promotion for a gun store’s grand opening.

The man was temporarily detained and cited for violating a city ordinance banning soliciting alongside roadways, police said. They said further charges are possible related to the man’s display of the firearm.

Derek Poe, owner of the store, said the man was hired to bring in business as part of the shop’s grand opening.

Poe’s store used to be located in the Parkdale Mall and he was stopped by police in December while carrying a rifle on his back inside the mall. He said he moved his store when the mall posted signs explaining the facility’s ban on carrying weapons.
Source: http://www.upi.com/Odd_News/2014/02/11/Police-respond-to-report-of-armed-man-in-banana-suit/UPI-39311392155140/#ixzz2t3XCxZ8j

 

Kentucky “guns in bars” bill moves forward

This is good news:

A Senate committee approved a measure Tuesday that would allow Kentuckians with concealed-carry permits to bring guns into bars as long as they don’t drink alcohol.

The bill’s sponsor, Sen. John Schickel, R-Union, said it’s “model legislation” pushed nationally by the National Rifle Association. Schickel said Senate Bill 60 would protect a law-abiding gun owner “if he has to defend himself, God forbid” while he’s in a bar.

The Senate Committee on Licensing, Occupations and Administrative Regulations voted 9 to 0 for the bill and sent it to the full Senate.

House Speaker Greg Stumbo, D-Prestonsburg, chuckled Tuesday when asked about the bill and said the legislature deliberately included bars on the list of places where concealed guns may not be carried, along with police stations, public schools, airports and a few other places.

“The exclusions were very well thought out,” Stumbo said. “Bars were one of them, for obvious reasons.”

Source: http://www.kentucky.com/2014/02/11/3082260/senate-panel-approves-bill-allowing.html#storylink=cpy

Greg Stumbo the Dumbo doesn’t realize that criminals don’t care about his stupid exclusions.

The logic of gun haters

Our enemies are like pedophiles who wonder why we don’t trust them with our children, take a look at this column by Alan Talaga: Madland: Open carry gun advocates play the victim

A few years back, some men went into a Culver’s on the east side of Madison with holstered guns plainly visible to the patrons around them, a stance known as open carry. Being dinner time at Culver’s, the place was naturally filled with old people. Those old people got scared, and called the cops, who went ahead and arrested the men. These men then sued the city and got $10,000 of taxpayer money.
Those guys were jerks. They were within their rights. They were still jerks.
Source: http://www.thedailypage.com/madland/article.php?article=42035

We’re the jerks? We’re not the ones who overreacted, called the police, then got arrested for exercising a constitutional right.

Now gun enthusiasts are feeling victimized thanks to the first-person tale related in an op-ed published by the Wausau Daily Herald. In it, an Iraq War veteran named Dereck Simonsmeier recalls his experience in getting kicked out of a Pick ‘n Save in Weston (basically it’s Wausau’s Middleton) for open carrying a gun in a side holster.

This isn’t like the Culver’s incident, as Simonsmeier wasn’t arrested. Since it was the manager who kicked him out of the store, his rights weren’t violated. A private business is deciding who it wants in the store, and getting booted for carrying a gun has nothing to do with illegal discrimination. Nevertheless, Simonsmeier is still playing the persecution card.

His rights weren’t violated? Sure they were, and while businesses are free to kick people out for behavior, the 2nd Amendment is an issue of identity for many of us.

Imagine if a bunch of people got together and started singing songs in the middle of a store. Management could kick them out, and it would not be a violation of their First Amendment rights.

That’s because such an act would be disruptive. Carrying a gun in your holster is not disruptive, cops carry guns in their holsters all the time as well, are you going to kick them out? Good luck.

These men are within their rights to carry guns around. But is it the society we really want to live in? Are we afraid of the people around us so much that the only way we feel we can trust them is if we have the ability to shoot and kill them at a moment’s notice? The Second Amendment is an important part of the Bill of Rights, but it’s not like the government is going to take away your gun if you leave it at home.

It’s the society the founding fathers gave us, or to be more accurate, the INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS they gave us. Are we afraid? No, I’m not afraid, I’m secure. I would be afraid if I didn’t have a gun, but since I have a gun I fear nothing. As for the government not taking away our guns, well, if a simple store manager can kick out an Iraq War Veteran for wearing a gun, I’m sure Big Government can come after my guns as well.

I’m also sure Alan Talaga would be perfectly happy if Uncle Obama abolished the 2nd Amendment, your anti-gun bias is quite obvious even if you try to disguise it occasionally.