Carjacking with a BB Gun?

I’d be so embarrassed if the men that robbed me did it with a BB Gun…

Three teens went for a joyride Friday night after using a BB gun to carjack a man on Bradshaw Drive, Sanford Police said.

Authorities arrested the teens Saturday morning. Each one was charged with robbery, carjacking, armed burglary and grand theft, according to police.

Around 11 p.m. Friday, three teens walked up to a man who was sitting inside his car, smoking a cigarette, Sanford Police said.

One of the them pointed a gun at the man, while the other two “rummaged through two other vehicles parked at the same location,” Sanford Police spokeswoman Shannon Cordingly said.

The teen kicked the man out of his own car, and sped away.

After a four-hour joyride, authorities found the teens and the car.

They also found the gun from the carjacking, and identified it as being a BB gun, police said.

Seminole County Sheriff’s Office and the Lake Mary Police Department helped in the arrest, Sanford Police said.

Authorities did not release the name of the victim. No one was hurt.

 Source: http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/breakingnews/os-three-teens-arrested-armed-carjacking-20131130,0,2802645.story

Anti-Gun Column on Alaskan Newspaper.

Here’s what a public health epidemic actually looks like- Mary Mallon, better known as Typhoid Mary, was the first person in the United States identified as an asymptomatic carrier of the pathogen associated with typhoid fever. Mary Sanchez thinks guns are an epidemic, perhaps she needs to meet Typhoid Mary, Tuberculosis Tina, and Amber Aids. OK, bad jokes.

Since Alaska is too cold for cockroaches, you’d think the Anchorage Daily News would not publish a column by an opinion-page columnist for The Kansas City Star.

Perhaps Mary Sanchez, no relation to Dirty Sanchez, would be happier in Mexico. Look as this drivel:

In the 12 months since that awful morning, virtually nothing substantial has been accomplished to address the nation’s gluttony for gun violence. Most Americans still do not accept gun deaths and accidents as a public health issue. Instead, we’ve gotten slicker about categorizing the ways guns are used in suicides, preventable accidents and the shootings that make up the evening news in most major cities

          Source: http://www.adn.com/2013/11/29/3204294/mary-sanchez- a-year-after-sandy.html#storylink=cpy

Public health is tuberculosis, Mary, or should I say Typhoid Mary?  Gun deaths are not a public health issue, they are a criminals vs. the gun-free zones issue.

It’s comfortable excuse making. Bad things happen to “other people,” in other neighborhoods — gang members, domestic violence victims, the mentally ill. No need to draw legal gun owners into the mix, goes the rationalization, to understand better how their guns might wind up in the wrong hands.

At my college ONE STUDENT had a car accident and died, the result was that the family donated 10 speed bumps which inconvenienced everyone. Why must we pay for the things we didn’t do?

The National Rifle Association used the mere possibility of deeper study of gun deaths as a recruitment drive. They stoked fears of shadowy government officials canvassing to confiscate America’s guns and ammunition. Their battle cries to “patriots” gave gun manufacturers a boost in sales as gun owners rushed to stock up on ammunition and arms. Some people swallowed the argument that simply putting more guns into more holsters would be an appropriate and effective response.

As if you people never recruited, have we forgotten the Bloomberg bus trip, Obama’s rallies, the Giffords’ gun show media show? You control 99% of the media, yet public opinion is with us, not you. By the way, more guns does mean less crime, statistics prove it.
Many a moderate NRA member in the past year has commented that the organization doesn’t seem to support their initial interests: hunting, target shooting, the right to keep a weapon in their home for protection. Yet there has been no attempt to organize those reasonable voices to retake their organization.

Give me their names! I can find you pro-life liberals, anti-gay marriage gays, but I doubt you can find me those NRA members because they only exist in your imagination, otherwise you’d be quoting them. By the way, if you were an NRA member, you’d know we are polled on a regular basis. Unlike the AARP, the NRA actually cares about what we think.  
Instead, the organization has become a one-stop shop for sophistry and rationalization for those who oppose responsible solutions to gun violence. My favorite: All we need to do is enforce the laws already on the books. Do they not know that most mass shooters get their guns and ammo legally? Including Adam Lanza.

Solutions like New York City were you have to pay $430 for a gun permit and then jump through hoops and still get denied? No thanks, we don’t want “solutions” from anti-gunners.  By the way, in this country even the guilty are treated like they’re innocent, you ought to read the Constitution, Marxist Mary, seems to me you’re confusing America with Mexico, a country where you are guilty until proven innocent.

Yet the report also noted that Lanza went through a box of tissues a day, fearful of even touching a doorknob. Black trash bags covered his bedroom windows. He created spreadsheets to document mass murders. In preschool, Lanza was given to “repetitive behaviors, temper tantrums, smelling things that were not there, excessive hand washing and eating idiosyncrasies.”

Yes, and he had a mother that did his laundry and put up with it, although to her credit, she did try to institutionalize her son but the State of Massachusetts made her jump through hoops because the ACLU, not a fan of gun rights, is a fan of loonies. By the way, 99.99% of crazy people don’t do what Lanza did, so the solution is not to ban fire to prevent fires but to let people carry fire extinguishers.
Let Mad Mary know what you think, e-mail her at  [email protected].

Anti-Oprah Meme.

We know race-baiting Oprah makes us

But it turns out Dr. Carson is no Saint of the Second Amendment either:

Asked by Beck for his thoughts on the Second Amendment, Carson gave the popular pro-gun argument: “There’s a reason for the Second Amendment; people do have the right to have weapons.”

But when asked whether people should be allowed to own “semi-automatic weapons,” the doctor replied: “It depends on where you live.”
Source: http://twg2a.wordpress.com/2013/03/25/dr-ben-carson-on-second-amendment-rights-it-depends-on-where-you-live/

Really Dr. Carson? So if a gang of 10 thugs are trying to break into my home, I’m not allowed a nice AR-15?

“I think if you live in the midst of a lot of people, and I’m afraid that that semi-automatic weapon is going to fall into the hands of a crazy person, I would rather you not have it,” Carson elaborated.

However, if you live “out in the country somewhere by yourself” and want to own a semi-automatic weapon, he added, “I’ve no problem with that.”
Source: http://www.mediaite.com/tv/conservative-hero-ben-carson-to-beck-you-have-no-right-to-semi-automatic-weapons-in-large-cities/

 

What is he thinking? That I’m going to spray gun-fire all over the neighborhood and hit an innocent victim? This isn’t Grand Theft Auto, Dr. Carson.

Either way, I’m not going to bash one of the biggest enemies of Obamacare. If Dr. Carson is misinformed, it’s up to us to educate him with a softer, kindler style, like the way they use on http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/

 

Concealed Carry Almost Impossible in Chicago Suburb.

Let’s say you live in Batavia and you go through all this to get your concealed carry permit:

The licensee has to be 21 years old, submit fingerprints, undergo a comprehensive criminal background check, submit a recent color head-and-shoulder photo and submit evidence that he or she has completed 16 hours of firearms training, including classroom and range instruction.

Source: http://batavia.patch.com/groups/police-and-fire/p/is-concealed-carry-impractical-or-near-impossible-in-geneva-batavia

In addition to the fees of course, yet what’s the point of going through all that if you can’t carry in the following places:

Prohibited Areas (Section 65)

 

A licensee shall not knowingly carry a firearm on or into any building, real property, and parking area under the control of:

1. A public or private elementary or secondary school.

2. A pre-school or child care facility, including any room or portion of a building under the control of a pre-school or child care facility.

3. An office of the executive or legislative branch of government, except licensees may carry a concealed firearm onto the real property, bikeway, or trail in a park regulated by the Department of Natural Resources or any other designated public hunting area or building where firearm possession is permitted.

4. An adult or juvenile detention or correctional institution, prison or jail.

5. A public or private hospital or hospital affiliate, mental health facility or nursing home.

6. An establishment that serves alcohol on its premises, if more than 50% of the establishment’s gross receipts within the prior three months is from the sale of alcohol.

7. A gaming facility licensed under the Riverboat Gambling Act or the Illinois Horse Racing Act of 1975 including an inter-track wagering location licensee.

A licensee shall not knowingly carry a firearm on or into any:

8. Public library, airport, amusement park, zoo or museum.

9. Public playground, public park, athletic area, or athletic facility under the control of a park district.

10. Cook County Forest Preserve District property.

11. Building, classroom, athletic venue, entertainment venue, parking area, common area, etc. of an public or private community college, college, or university.

12. Circuit Court, Appellate Court or Supreme Court buildings.

13. Buildings under the control of local government.

14. Special events or public gatherings conducted on property open to the public and requires the issuance of a permit from unit of local government.

15. Stadium, arena or real property under the control of a stadium or arena.

16. Bus, train or other form of public transportation or any real property under the control of a public transportation facilit

17. Any real property owned or controlled by a nuclear energy, storage, weapons, or development site.

18. Any area where firearms are prohibited by federal law.

19. Any building or real property that has been issued a special event or special use permit during the time designated for the sale of alcohol at that location.
Source: Idem

 

Great, so I suppose the criminals will not carry their guns in those places, right? What’s the point of a concealed carry permit if you can’t carry? This is why the Statists love Big Government, they can regulate out rights out of existence.

Of course, no city is perfect. Here in Chattanooga I can’t carry at the movies, the shopping mall, and even a small area outside the Aquarium has that hateful gun-free zone.

However, I can carry in a bar and most restaurants (as long as I don’t drink and the bar doesn’t have that hateful anti-gun sticker), and I can leave my gun since there are no gun-free parking lots as far as I know.

Yet do I like it? No. Imagine the outcry if there was a Black-Free Zone, or Jewish-Free Zone, or Gay-Free Zone. The ACLU and the EEOC would be up in arms, no pun intended.

Yet where is the outcry against our Gun-Free Zones? If you agree with me, sign the petition.

 

 

 

Beating the Dems with Bill de Blasio.

Bill de Blasio hates guns, Capitalism, tobacco, he’s Bloomberg with better looks sans  the money, and while he’s a curse in New York, he could be a blessing for Republicans everywhere else.

De Blasio poses interesting challenges for the Democratic Party,” said Darrell M. West, director of the Governance Studies at the Brookings Institution. “He is more liberal than the typical officeholder and will attract a lot of media attention given his platform in New York City. That will inject him into many public discussions. I don’t think he will become a Ted Cruz figure for the Democratic side, but he has the potential to be a Howard Dean who seeks to rally the public towards a more progressive view of the world.”

A challenge indeed, because unlike Obama and the pseudo-centrists, De Blasio can’t hide his Marxism, his remarks are likely to be heard all over America. All Republicans have to do is deliver the following message: Democrat = De Blasio.
If you believe in the free market, in guns, in Capitalism, in the freedom to eat what you want, then why would you vote for a Democrat?
We don’t have to lie about De Blasio to hurt him, in fact, I don’t believe in lying about anyone. Why lie when the truth is deadly enough?
Forget the rumor mill and conspiracy theory land, let’s just watch what De Blasio says, let’s report his words, post his videos, show his dirt to the world.

When 2016 finally arrives, our message will be clear to America. You can continue with the Obama’s, DeBlasio’s, Clinton’s Marxism or you can choose real change, not change for the sake of change, but the American restoration our country deserves.