Chuck Control.

Chuck Control.

“Yes, this really is Sen. Schumer blazing away with a TEC-9. I remember seeing it, or one like, it on MSNBC.com several years ago, and forwarding the story to friends with the note that if Schumer weren’t such an anti-gun putz, he’d have NRA-certified instructors on the range who would ensure that he had appropriate eye protection, and a proper grip and stance. The event was a demonstration of the outrageous destructive power of immoral assault weapons, or some such nonsense.” –Sean Flynn

http://www.keepandbeararms.com/newsarchives/XcNewsPlus.asp?cmd=view&articleid=1161

His Gun Ban Record:

Renew assault weapons ban – no legitimate use for them.
Cutting record-keeping limits fosters gun sale fraud & abuse.
Close the Gun Show Loophole; restrict show sales: Ban large-capacity ammunition: YES on banning high-capacity magazines of over 10 bullets:
NO on loosening license & background checks at gun shows:
YES on background checks at gun shows:
NO on banning lawsuits against gun manufacturers for gun violence:
NO on prohibiting lawsuits against gun manufacturers:
NO on prohibiting foreign & UN aid that restricts US gun ownership:
NO on allowing firearms in checked baggage on Amtrak trains:

http://www.ontheissues.org/senate/charles_schumer.htm

So Chucky, WTF?!?!

Doing the math on gun control.

Doing the math on gun control.

So a bunch of mathematicians who admit they don’t have enough data decided to mess with our Second Amendment.

“It’s time to bring a scientific framework to this problem,” said Dominik Wodarz, the lead author of a new paper published in the journal PLOS ONE. “Can we design a rational way to argue about guns?”

http://www.webpronews.com/mathematicians-bring-numbers-to-the-gun-debate-2013-07

Well, you could try reading More Guns, Less Crimes by John Lott, lots of math and statistics there.

“The couple found that for common domestic and one-on-one gun crimes, reducing the availability of legal firearms is likely to lower death rates – as long as laws are properly enforced. For mass shootings, the results showed that armed citizens could help reduce the number of deaths – but only if trained to avoid shooting bystanders.”

So if I get rid of my gun I would suddenly become a safer neighbor? And if a mass shooting in school occurs, then it’s OK to have my gun but I better know the difference between a crazy mass murderer shooting at people and bystanders.

“If the current discussion could be steered toward science, rather than having a heated debate without much of a logical foundation, a big step forward toward saving lives would be achieved,” wrote Wodarz.

You know who else loved science? Hitler and his Nazis, they loved eugenics, Zyklon-B, gas chambers, euthanizing retarded children, we got lucky that we came up with the nuclear bomb before they did.

But don’t take me wrong, I’m not anti-Science, I’m anti-collective demands in the name of science. This is the same kind of thinking that leads to war against obesity, tobacco bans, anti-GMO legislation, and all kinds of nonsense such as having to die because it takes the FDA 7-years to approve a lifesaving drug.